↓ Skip to main content

C1q is elevated during chronic Staphylococcus epidermidis central nervous system catheter infection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
C1q is elevated during chronic Staphylococcus epidermidis central nervous system catheter infection
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1342467
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Beaver, Lara Bergdolt, Anna Dunaevsky, Tammy Kielian, Gwenn L. Skar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2024.
All research outputs
#16,294,636
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#15,955
of 32,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,914
of 231,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#104
of 759 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 759 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.