The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of cGAS-STING inhibition in liver disease, kidney disease, and cellular senescence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1346446 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ling Wang, Zhengwei Zhang, Haichao Zhang, Minmin Zhou, Cheng Huang, Wenjiang Xia, Jun Li, Hongmei You |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2024.
All research outputs
#16,796,983
of 26,456,908 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#17,559
of 33,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,255
of 194,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#119
of 550 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,456,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 550 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.