You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Case report: A family of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome involving a CFH::CFHR1 fusion gene and CFHR3-1-4-2 gene duplication
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1360855 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuko Tasaki, Hiroshi Tsujimoto, Tadafumi Yokoyama, Naotoshi Sugimoto, Shinji Kitajima, Hiroshi Fujii, Yoshihiko Hidaka, Noritoshi Kato, Shoichi Maruyama, Norimitsu Inoue, Taizo Wada |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,020,659
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#9,343
of 32,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,920
of 350,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#189
of 1,203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.