The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary galactose exacerbates autoimmune neuroinflammation via advanced glycation end product-mediated neurodegeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1367819 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefanie Haase, Kristina Kuhbandner, Florian Mühleck, Barbara Gisevius, David Freudenstein, Sarah Hirschberg, De-Hyung Lee, Stefanie Kuerten, Ralf Gold, Aiden Haghikia, Ralf A. Linker |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2024.
All research outputs
#17,575,207
of 26,555,952 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#19,345
of 33,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,377
of 201,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#140
of 469 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,555,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 469 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.