↓ Skip to main content

The oxidant-antioxidant imbalance was involved in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The oxidant-antioxidant imbalance was involved in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1380846
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Zhou, Jiao Zhou, Ruowu Liu, Yafeng Liu, Juan Meng, Qiao Wen, Yirui Luo, Shixi Liu, Huabin Li, Luo Ba, Jintao Du

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2024.
All research outputs
#20,499,183
of 26,058,621 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#23,241
of 32,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,531
of 259,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#318
of 900 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,058,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 900 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.