↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of COVID-19 XBB.1.5 monovalent mRNA vaccine in Korea: interim analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of COVID-19 XBB.1.5 monovalent mRNA vaccine in Korea: interim analysis
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1382944
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eliel Nham, Jang Wook Sohn, Won Suk Choi, Seong-Heon Wie, Jacob Lee, Jin-Soo Lee, Hye Won Jeong, Joong Sik Eom, Yu Jung Choi, Hye Seong, Jin Gu Yoon, Ji Yun Noh, Joon Young Song, Hee Jin Cheong, Woo Joo Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,204,290
of 26,047,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#18,890
of 32,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,366
of 214,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#130
of 698 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,047,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 698 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.