The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Myelomodulatory treatments augment the therapeutic benefit of oncolytic viroimmunotherapy in murine models of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1384623 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Siddhi N. Paudel, Brian J. Hutzen, Katherine E. Miller, Elizabeth A. R. Garfinkle, Chun-Yu Chen, Pin-Yi Wang, Andrea M. Glaspell, Mark A. Currier, Emily M. Ringwalt, Louis Boon, Elaine R. Mardis, Mitchell S. Cairo, Nancy Ratner, Rebecca D. Dodd, Kevin A. Cassady, Timothy P. Cripe |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#18,039,961
of 26,399,279 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#21,184
of 33,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,610
of 261,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#179
of 714 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,399,279 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 714 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.