The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The involvement of peritoneal GATA6+ macrophages in the pathogenesis of endometriosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1396000 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mingxin Shi, James A MacLean, Kanako Hayashi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,632,140
of 26,559,762 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#10,634
of 33,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,620
of 193,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#54
of 450 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 450 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.