↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Advances of novel approaches to enhance therapeutic efficacy and safety in human solid cold tumor

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Advances of novel approaches to enhance therapeutic efficacy and safety in human solid cold tumor
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1398270
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shicheng Guo, Xiaoting Xie, Yang Chen, Yanqing Liu, Lianxiang Luo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,773,075
of 26,393,142 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#23,619
of 33,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,517
of 352,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#589
of 1,184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,393,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.