↓ Skip to main content

A single-center, retrospective study-spring-evaluating the efficacy and safety of recombinant human vascular endothelial inhibitor combined with anti-PD-1 in elderly patients aged 80 and above with…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

reddit
2 Redditors
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A single-center, retrospective study-spring-evaluating the efficacy and safety of recombinant human vascular endothelial inhibitor combined with anti-PD-1 in elderly patients aged 80 and above with NSCLC
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1402018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tian Xing, Qianqian Gao, Hongbin Zhu, Jianrong Gao, Ganglin Yan

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,465,922
of 26,343,220 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#25,692
of 32,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,002
of 222,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#183
of 568 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,343,220 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 568 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.