↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the predictive value of smoking history for immunotherapy outcomes in bladder cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the predictive value of smoking history for immunotherapy outcomes in bladder cancer patients
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1404812
Authors

Jianqiu Kong, Yitong Zou, Hua Zhou, Yi Huang, Ying Lin, Shuogui Fang, Zhijian Chen, Junjiong Zheng, Yaqiang Huang, Zefeng Shen, Weibin Xie, Xinxiang Fan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2024.
All research outputs
#20,605,628
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#23,366
of 32,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,574
of 189,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#169
of 590 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 590 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.