The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Humoral immune responses primed by the alteration of gut microbiota were associated with galactose-deficient IgA1 production in IgA nephropathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1415026 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Li Gao, Huixian Li, Xiaoling Liu, Haiyun Li, Peiqi Li, Wanhong Lu, Xinfang Xie, Jicheng Lv, Jing Jin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2024.
All research outputs
#16,869,719
of 26,559,762 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#17,642
of 33,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,996
of 258,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#157
of 660 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,559,762 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 660 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.