The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Divergent effects of itaconate isomers on Coxiella burnetii growth in macrophages and in axenic culture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1427457 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nur A Alam Siddique, Fabian Kellermeier, Martha Ölke, Mingming Zhao, Konrad Büssow, Peter J. Oefner, Anja Lührmann, Katja Dettmer, Roland Lang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2024.
All research outputs
#23,828,233
of 26,522,299 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#28,835
of 33,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,300
of 200,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#326
of 504 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,522,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 504 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.