The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emerging therapeutic strategies targeting extracellular histones for critical and inflammatory diseases: an updated narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1438984 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tinghang Yang, Jing Peng, Zhuyun Zhang, Yu Chen, Zhihui Liu, Luojia Jiang, Lunqiang Jin, Mei Han, Baihai Su, Yupei Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,656,035
of 26,588,416 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#26,017
of 33,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,249
of 207,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#259
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.