The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The significance of CD16+ monocytes in the occurrence and development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: insights from single-cell RNA sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1446710 |
| Authors |
Maohe Chen, Qiuxia Wu, Nan Shao, Xingyue Lai, Huo Lin, Min Chen, Yijing Wu, Jiafan Chen, Qinghuang Lin, Jiahui Huang, Xiaoyun Chen, Wei Yan, Shi Chen, Hongli Li, Dawen Wu, Minxia Yang, Chaosheng Deng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2024.
All research outputs
#17,564,080
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#19,336
of 33,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,133
of 175,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#126
of 432 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 432 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.