↓ Skip to main content

Controls over Ocean Mesopelagic Interior Carbon Storage (COMICS): Fieldwork, Synthesis, and Modeling Efforts

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Controls over Ocean Mesopelagic Interior Carbon Storage (COMICS): Fieldwork, Synthesis, and Modeling Efforts
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2016.00136
Authors

Richard J. Sanders, Stephanie A. Henson, Adrian P. Martin, Tom R. Anderson, Raffaele Bernardello, Peter Enderlein, Sophie Fielding, Sarah L. C. Giering, Manuela Hartmann, Morten Iversen, Samar Khatiwala, Phyllis Lam, Richard Lampitt, Daniel J. Mayor, Mark C. Moore, Eugene Murphy, Stuart C. Painter, Alex J. Poulton, Kevin Saw, Gabriele Stowasser, Geraint A. Tarling, Sinhue Torres-Valdes, Mark Trimmer, George A. Wolff, Andrew Yool, Mike Zubkov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 6 6%
Professor 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 30 31%
Environmental Science 19 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Chemistry 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 25 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,466,525
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#3,253
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,724
of 388,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#27
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.