The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Indicator-Based Assessment of Marine Biological Diversity–Lessons from 10 Case Studies across the European Seas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2016.00159 |
| Authors |
Laura Uusitalo, Hugues Blanchet, Jesper H. Andersen, Olivier Beauchard, Torsten Berg, Silvia Bianchelli, Annalucia Cantafaro, Jacob Carstensen, Laura Carugati, Sabine Cochrane, Roberto Danovaro, Anna-Stiina Heiskanen, Ville Karvinen, Snejana Moncheva, Ciaran Murray, João M. Neto, Henrik Nygård, Maria Pantazi, Nadia Papadopoulou, Nomiki Simboura, Greta Srėbalienė, Maria C. Uyarra, Angel Borja |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Jamaica | 1 | 9% |
| Sweden | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 42 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 40 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,322,547
of 26,356,696 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#2,622
of 11,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,994
of 348,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#21
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,356,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.