The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 171 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deep-Sea Mining With No Net Loss of Biodiversity—An Impossible Aim
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2018.00053 |
| Authors |
Holly J. Niner, Jeff A. Ardron, Elva G. Escobar, Matthew Gianni, Aline Jaeckel, Daniel O. B. Jones, Lisa A. Levin, Craig R. Smith, Torsten Thiele, Phillip J. Turner, Cindy L. Van Dover, Les Watling, Kristina M. Gjerde |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 9% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Peru | 3 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Comoros | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 94 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 139 | 81% |
| Scientists | 25 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 376 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 11% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Other | 39 | 10% |
| Unknown | 115 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 96 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 22 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 11% |
| Unknown | 130 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 339. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#103,572
of 26,516,527 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#55
of 11,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,467
of 349,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#3
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,516,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.