The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sampling and Processing Methods Impact Microbial Community Structure and Potential Activity in a Seasonally Anoxic Fjord: Saanich Inlet, British Columbia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2019.00132 |
| Authors |
Mónica Torres-Beltrán, Andreas Mueller, Melanie Scofield, Maria G. Pachiadaki, Craig Taylor, Kateryna Tyshchenko, Céline Michiels, Phyllis Lam, Osvaldo Ulloa, Klaus Jürgens, Jung-Ho Hyun, Virginia P. Edgcomb, Sean A. Crowe, Steven J. Hallam |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| China | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,620,696
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#2,770
of 8,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,739
of 351,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#111
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.