↓ Skip to main content

Lessons Learnt From Linking Global Recommendations With Localized Marine Restoration Schemes and Policy Options by Using Mixed Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lessons Learnt From Linking Global Recommendations With Localized Marine Restoration Schemes and Policy Options by Using Mixed Methods
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2020
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2020.00532
Authors

Gesche Krause, Christine Wolf, Anne-Kathrin Happe, Jennifer Hauck, Pier Luigi Buttigieg, Nike Fuchs, Jan Scheve, Claudia König, Heidi Wittmer, Kristina Raab

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 11%
Computer Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#14,428,208
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#5,007
of 8,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,857
of 398,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#240
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.