You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shorebirds Affect Ecosystem Functioning on an Intertidal Mudflat
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2020.00685 |
| Authors |
James M. Booty, Graham J. C. Underwood, Amie Parris, Richard G. Davies, Trevor J. Tolhurst |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 44% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 5 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 16 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,834,764
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#1,927
of 8,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,608
of 398,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#90
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.