You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Essentials of Marine Biotechnology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2021.629629 |
| Authors |
Ana Rotter, Michéle Barbier, Francesco Bertoni, Atle M. Bones, M. Leonor Cancela, Jens Carlsson, Maria F. Carvalho, Marta Cegłowska, Jerónimo Chirivella-Martorell, Meltem Conk Dalay, Mercedes Cueto, Thanos Dailianis, Irem Deniz, Ana R. Díaz-Marrero, Dragana Drakulovic, Arita Dubnika, Christine Edwards, Hjörleifur Einarsson, Ayşegül Erdoǧan, Orhan Tufan Eroldoǧan, David Ezra, Stefano Fazi, Richard J. FitzGerald, Laura M. Gargan, Susana P. Gaudêncio, Marija Gligora Udovič, Nadica Ivošević DeNardis, Rósa Jónsdóttir, Marija Kataržytė, Katja Klun, Jonne Kotta, Leila Ktari, Zrinka Ljubešić, Lada Lukić Bilela, Manolis Mandalakis, Alexia Massa-Gallucci, Inga Matijošytė, Hanna Mazur-Marzec, Mohamed Mehiri, Søren Laurentius Nielsen, Lucie Novoveská, Donata Overlingė, Giuseppe Perale, Praveen Ramasamy, Céline Rebours, Thorsten Reinsch, Fernando Reyes, Baruch Rinkevich, Johan Robbens, Eric Röttinger, Vita Rudovica, Jerica Sabotič, Ivo Safarik, Siret Talve, Deniz Tasdemir, Xenia Theodotou Schneider, Olivier P. Thomas, Anna Toruńska-Sitarz, Giovanna Cristina Varese, Marlen I. Vasquez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 7% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Turkey | 2 | 5% |
| Denmark | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Iceland | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 71% |
| Scientists | 11 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 428 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 50 | 12% |
| Unknown | 221 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 4% |
| Engineering | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 66 | 15% |
| Unknown | 236 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,061,860
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#699
of 10,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,699
of 455,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#35
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.