↓ Skip to main content

Reconstruction of Marine Commercial Landings for the Brazilian Industrial and Artisanal Fisheries From 1950 to 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconstruction of Marine Commercial Landings for the Brazilian Industrial and Artisanal Fisheries From 1950 to 2015
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2021.659110
Authors

Kátia Meirelles Felizola Freire, Zafira da Silva de Almeida, José Raimundo Emanoel Trindade Amador, José Augusto Aragão, Ana Rosa da Rocha Araújo, Antônio Olinto Ávila-da-Silva, Bianca Bentes, Marcus Henrique Carneiro, Julien Chiquieri, Cezar Augusto Freire Fernandes, Marina Bezerra Figueiredo, Maurício Hostim-Silva, Érica Antunes Jimenez, Karina Annes Keunecke, Priscila Fabiana Macedo Lopes, Jocemar Tomasino Mendonça, Joelson Musiello-Fernandes, George Olavo, Camila Primitivo, Matheus Marcos Rotundo, Raynara Filho Santana, Rodrigo Sant’Ana, Guilherme Scheidt, Luis Maurício Abdon da Silva, Isaac Trindade-Santos, Gonzalo Velasco, Marcelo Vianna

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 32%
Environmental Science 10 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,930,859
of 26,383,519 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#1,966
of 11,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,653
of 446,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#117
of 608 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,519 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 608 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.