↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Deep-Sea Nematodes of the Mozambique Channel: Evidence of Random Community Assembly Dynamics in Seep Sediments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Deep-Sea Nematodes of the Mozambique Channel: Evidence of Random Community Assembly Dynamics in Seep Sediments
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2021.685177
Authors

Lara Macheriotou, Annelien Rigaux, Karine Olu, Daniela Zeppilli, Sofie Derycke, Ann Vanreusel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#18,030,438
of 26,382,745 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#7,825
of 11,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,403
of 458,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#332
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,382,745 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.