↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomy and phylogeny of Pseudovorticella ciliates (Ciliophora, Peritrichia): Two new and one rare species from the coastal waters of China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taxonomy and phylogeny of Pseudovorticella ciliates (Ciliophora, Peritrichia): Two new and one rare species from the coastal waters of China
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2022.1030519
Authors

Yong Zhang, Ying Yu, Zhishuai Qu, Mengmeng Jiang, Zhuo Shen, Jiqiu Li, Xiaofeng Lin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#18,624,695
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#6,978
of 8,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,808
of 439,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#530
of 783 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 783 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.