↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of ocean deoxygenation between CMIP models and an observational dataset in the North Pacific from 1958 to 2005

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of ocean deoxygenation between CMIP models and an observational dataset in the North Pacific from 1958 to 2005
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, November 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2023.1161451
Authors

Yumi Abe, Shoshiro Minobe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,309,001
of 25,990,612 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#5,279
of 11,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,062
of 376,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#136
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.