The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Anomalously large latent heat fluxes in low to moderate wind conditions within the eddy-rich zone of the Northwestern Pacific
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2024.1298641 |
Authors |
Sok Kuh Kang, Eun Jin Kim, Sunghun Kim, Joseph Cione, Dongkyu Lee, Sebastian Landwehr, Hyoun-Woo Kang, Kyeong-Ok Kim, Chang Su Hong, Min Ho Kwon, Kyung-Hee Oh, Jae Hak Lee, Suyun Noh, Jae Kwi So, Dong-Jin Kang, Dongseon Kim, Jae-Hyoung Park, SungHyun Nam, Yang Ki Cho, Brian Ward, Isaac Ginis |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,673,264
of 26,515,106 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#5,388
of 11,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,576
of 383,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#129
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,515,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.