↓ Skip to main content

Zooplanktivory in garden eels: benefits and shortcomings of being “anchored” compared with other coral-reef fish

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zooplanktivory in garden eels: benefits and shortcomings of being “anchored” compared with other coral-reef fish
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2024.1330379
Authors

Alexandra Khrizman, Irena Kolesnikov, Dmitri Churilov, Amatzia Genin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#17,588,925
of 26,579,895 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#7,363
of 11,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,113
of 359,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#251
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,579,895 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.