The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Organic carbon burial and their implication on sea surface primary productivity in the middle Okinawa Trough over the past 200 ka
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2024.1331940 |
| Authors |
Yunge Jing, Taoliang Zhang, Ben Zhu, Jingtao Zhao, Xiaoxiao Zhao, Yanguang Dou, Qing Li, Feng Cai, Bangqi Hu, Liang Dong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,806,231
of 26,430,863 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#8,421
of 11,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,712
of 380,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#308
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,430,863 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.