You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Drone-based photogrammetry reveals differences in humpback whale body condition and mass across North Atlantic foraging grounds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2024.1336455 |
| Authors |
Chelsi Napoli, Nathan Hirtle, Julia Stepanuk, Fredrik Christiansen, Eleanor I. Heywood, Thomas J. Grove, Alyssa Stoller, Flordespina Dodds, Maria Glarou, Marianne H. Rasmussen, Gina L. Lonati, Kimberley T.A. Davies, Simone Videsen, Malene J. Simon, Tenna K. Boye, Ann Zoidis, Sean K. Todd, Lesley H. Thorne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,446,318
of 26,213,016 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#3,962
of 11,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,277
of 158,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#15
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,016 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.