↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Biotechnological solutions to assess, monitor and remediate metal pollution in the marine environment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Biotechnological solutions to assess, monitor and remediate metal pollution in the marine environment
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2024.1345500
Authors

Sílvia C. Gonçalves, Zhisong Cui, K. Suresh Kumar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,403,326
of 26,267,662 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#9,084
of 11,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,052
of 377,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#348
of 455 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,267,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 455 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.