↓ Skip to main content

Best practices for Core Argo floats - Part 2: physical handling, deployment and metadata considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best practices for Core Argo floats - Part 2: physical handling, deployment and metadata considerations
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2024.1358048
Authors

Tamaryn Morris, Megan Scanderbeg, Deborah West-Mack, Claire Gourcuff, Noé Poffa, Tata V. S. Udaya Bhaskar, Craig Hanstein, Steve Diggs, Lynne Talley, Victor Turpin, Zenghong Liu, Breck Owens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,903,574
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#7,083
of 10,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,045
of 158,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#125
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.