You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biodegradation of polypropylene by filter-feeding marine scallop Mizuhopecten yessoensis: infrared spectroscopy evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2024.1362231 |
| Authors |
Viktor Pavlovich Chelomin, Aleksandra Anatolyevna Istomina, Andrey Alexandrovich Mazur, Avianna Fayazovna Zhukovskaya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,100,716
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#6,067
of 10,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,601
of 263,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#146
of 412 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 412 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.