The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reduced seagrass resilience due to environmental and anthropogenic effects may lead to future die-off events in Florida Bay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2024.1366939 |
| Authors |
Jimmy de Fouw, Christopher J. Madden, Bradley T. Furman, Margaret O. Hall, Yvon Verstijnen, Sander Holthuijsen, Thomas A. Frankovich, Theresa Strazisar, Michelle Blaha, Tjisse Van Der Heide |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,451,183
of 26,323,740 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#9,127
of 11,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,622
of 144,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#112
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,323,740 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.