↓ Skip to main content

High-resolution sampling in the eastern tropical North Atlantic reveals episodic Saharan dust deposition: implications for the marine carbon sink

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-resolution sampling in the eastern tropical North Atlantic reveals episodic Saharan dust deposition: implications for the marine carbon sink
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2024.1367786
Authors

Blanda A. Matzenbacher, Geert-Jan A. Brummer, Maarten A. Prins, Jan-Berend W. Stuut

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#15,451,887
of 26,188,345 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#5,312
of 11,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,574
of 150,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#22
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,188,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.