↓ Skip to main content

Spring circulation characteristics and formation mechanism in the Beibu Gulf

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spring circulation characteristics and formation mechanism in the Beibu Gulf
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2024.1398702
Authors

Jingsong Gao, Lingqing Mo, Hanfang Lu, Xiaoni Meng, Guidan Wu, Dapeng Wang, Kim-Cuong Nguyen, Baoqing Hu, Anh Tu Tran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2024.
All research outputs
#17,258,466
of 26,127,783 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#7,188
of 11,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,707
of 154,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#54
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,127,783 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.