↓ Skip to main content

Effects of heating rate on upper thermal limit: insights from cardiac performance and transcriptomic response in mudflat snail Batillaria attramentaria

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of heating rate on upper thermal limit: insights from cardiac performance and transcriptomic response in mudflat snail Batillaria attramentaria
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2024.1407743
Authors

Li-Na Du, Ying-Hui Du, Guo-Dong Han

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,438,886
of 26,310,456 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#9,114
of 11,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,200
of 153,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#117
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,310,456 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.