↓ Skip to main content

2D/2D Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4) Heterojunction Nanocomposites for Photocatalysis: Why Does Face-to-Face Interface Matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 3,127)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
67 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2D/2D Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4) Heterojunction Nanocomposites for Photocatalysis: Why Does Face-to-Face Interface Matter?
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2017.00011
Authors

Wee-Jun Ong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 166 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 23%
Student > Master 22 13%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 60 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 37 22%
Materials Science 21 13%
Engineering 12 7%
Chemical Engineering 11 7%
Physics and Astronomy 8 5%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 67 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#932,850
of 26,423,535 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#15
of 3,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,345
of 328,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,423,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them