The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Electrochemical Sensor: L-Cysteine Induced Selectivity Enhancement of Electrochemically Reduced Graphene Oxide–Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Hybrid for Detection of Lead (Pb2+) Ions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Materials, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmats.2020.00068 |
| Authors |
Theeazen AL-Gahouari, Gajanan Bodkhe, Pasha Sayyad, Nikesh Ingle, Manasi Mahadik, Sumedh M. Shirsat, Megha Deshmukh, Nadeem Musahwar, Mehendra Shirsat |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 27% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 11 | 25% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 14% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#18,718,509
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#610
of 2,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,002
of 370,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#34
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,556 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.