The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimization of Anti-kinking Designs for Vascular Grafts Based on Supramolecular Materials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Materials, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmats.2020.00220 |
| Authors |
Dan Jing Wu, Kim van Dongen, Wojciech Szymczyk, Paul J. Besseling, Ruth M. Cardinaels, Giulia Marchioli, Marcel H. P. van Genderen, Carlijn V. C. Bouten, Anthal I. P. M. Smits, Patricia Y. W. Dankers |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 9 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,958,211
of 23,220,133 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#272
of 2,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,263
of 397,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#21
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,220,133 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,559 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.