↓ Skip to main content

Numerical simulation and analysis of crack disease in tunnel lining structure

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Numerical simulation and analysis of crack disease in tunnel lining structure
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2022.1007855
Authors

Song Chen, Zhao Yang, Shuo Liu, Liufang Li, Yibo Zheng, Ying Yuan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#16,640,755
of 24,483,002 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#418
of 2,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,367
of 425,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#14
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,483,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,864 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.