↓ Skip to main content

Theoretical analysis and experimental study on physical explosion of stratospheric airship envelope

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Theoretical analysis and experimental study on physical explosion of stratospheric airship envelope
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2022.1046229
Authors

Lin Song, Yanchu Yang, Zhidong Zheng, Zeqing He, Xiaojun Zhang, Heng Gao, Xiqing Guo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2023.
All research outputs
#19,569,977
of 24,071,812 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#656
of 2,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,563
of 442,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#15
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,071,812 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,767 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.