↓ Skip to main content

Research on the underwater cutting mechanism of flux-cored arc cutting for aluminum alloy process

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Research on the underwater cutting mechanism of flux-cored arc cutting for aluminum alloy process
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2022.1080981
Authors

Rui Yu, Wenhang Li, Jiayou Wang, Mingfang Wu, Jianxin Wang, Jing Wu, Sergii Yuri Maksimov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#19,516,420
of 24,007,780 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#654
of 2,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#317,577
of 439,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#17
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,007,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,756 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.