↓ Skip to main content

Study on the Mechanism of Failure in the LiF–NaF–KF Molten-Salt-Purifying Processing System

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study on the Mechanism of Failure in the LiF–NaF–KF Molten-Salt-Purifying Processing System
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2022.839538
Authors

Huajian Liu, Shuangjian Chen, Jie Fu, Xinmei Yang, Rui Tang, Min Ge, Jianqiang Wang, Xingtai Zhou, Leidong Xie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2022.
All research outputs
#18,036,345
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#468
of 2,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#376,736
of 551,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#40
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,548 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 551,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.