↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Design of two-dimensional functional materials and nanodevices

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Design of two-dimensional functional materials and nanodevices
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2022.976642
Authors

Guangzhao Wang, Junjie He, Xiaotian Wang, Zhaofu Zhang, Yee Sin Ang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#19,831,899
of 24,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#661
of 2,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,330
of 419,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#27
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.