↓ Skip to main content

In-house vs. commercial boron-doped diamond electrodes for electrochemical degradation of water pollutants: A critical review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In-house vs. commercial boron-doped diamond electrodes for electrochemical degradation of water pollutants: A critical review
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2023.1020649
Authors

Priscilla Brosler, Ana Violeta Girão, Rui F. Silva, João Tedim, Filipe J. Oliveira

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 14 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 16%
Chemical Engineering 3 10%
Engineering 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 17 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,101,306
of 23,979,951 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#247
of 2,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,221
of 402,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#4
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,951 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,747 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.