↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Women in science: Materials 2021

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Women in science: Materials 2021
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, January 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2023.1129648
Authors

Patricia Krawczak, Lucia Baldino, Francisca Garcia Caballero, Ya Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#13,281,895
of 23,956,119 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#142
of 2,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,925
of 443,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#2
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,956,119 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,711 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.