↓ Skip to main content

Cyclic axial compressive performance of hybrid double-skin tubular square columns

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cyclic axial compressive performance of hybrid double-skin tubular square columns
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, September 2023
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2023.1214147
Authors

Dai Wang, Jian Song Yuan, Yunchu Li, Quanchao Fu, Hengchang Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,648,564
of 24,494,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#419
of 2,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,051
of 168,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#1
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,494,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,866 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.