↓ Skip to main content

Performance of high-belite calcium sulfoaluminate cement subjected to hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance of high-belite calcium sulfoaluminate cement subjected to hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2023.1282919
Authors

Guang Huo, Xinchao Jiang, Xiaoheng Sun, Hui Li, Hongxing Shi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,473,400
of 25,161,628 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#759
of 3,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,966
of 174,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#3
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,161,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,002 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.