↓ Skip to main content

Cracking characteristics evaluation for reinforcement basalt fiber reactive powder concrete beam using acoustic emission

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Materials, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cracking characteristics evaluation for reinforcement basalt fiber reactive powder concrete beam using acoustic emission
Published in
Frontiers in Materials, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fmats.2024.1346140
Authors

Xiang Lyu, Wenjun Li, Hang Hu, Xuezheng Ding, Xiaochuan Hu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,760,665
of 26,363,900 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Materials
#550
of 3,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,788
of 378,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Materials
#7
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,363,900 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.